IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Rev. No. 166 of 2026 Reserved on: 31.03.2026 Date of Decision: 22.4.2026.

Ishan Khan f...Petitioner Versus Devi Singh and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ Yes.

For the Petitioner : Mr Bhupinder Singh Ahuja, Advocate.

For Respondents : Nemo Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The present revision is directed against the order dated 10^th November 2025 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bilaspur (learned Trial Court) vide which a complaint filed by the petitioner (complainant before learned trial Court) was dismissed. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revision are that the complainant filed a complaint before the Station House Officer (SHO), police Station Sadar, District Bilaspur, asserting that his grandmother had executed a Will bequeathing the first floor of her building to him. A mutation number 733 dated 2^nd April 2004 was attested based o