SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(HP) 1938

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
SUNIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Maan Singh ,Respondent Advocate: AG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

Cr.MP(M) No. 566 of 2026 Decided on: 23.04.2026 ________________________________________________________

Sunil Kumar ………..Petitioner Versus f State of Himachal Pradesh ….Respondent ________________________________________________________

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting? 1 Yes.

For the Petitioner : Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate.

For the Respondent : Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General.

h ASI Satinder Singh, Police Station Mcleodganj, Dharamshala, District Kangra, HP, present in person.

________________________________________________________

Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral) :

H Bail petitioner Sunil Kumar, who is behind bars since

22.09.2025, has approached this Court by way of present petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.22 of 2025, dated 24.05.2025, registered at Police Station Mcleodganj, Dharamshala, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, under Sections 20 and 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (in short “ND & PS Act”).

1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top