Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Sandeep Sharma, J
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural background and summary of evidence against the petitioner. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. contentions regarding the admissibility of co-accused disclosure. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. fundamental right to speedy trial and constitutional protections under article 21. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. general principles governing the grant of bail in criminal justice. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. granting of bail subject to specific conditions. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Bail petitioner Sunil Kumar, who is behind bars since 22.09.2025, has approached this Court by way of present petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita , for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.22 of 2025, dated 24.05.2025, registered at Police Station Mcleodganj, Dharamshala, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, under Sections 20 and 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (in short “ND & PS Act”).
________________________________________________________
2. Pursuant to order dated 08.04.2026, respondent-State has filed status report and ASI Satinder Singh has come present with record. Record perused and returned.
3. Close security of reco
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
