SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(HP) 1975

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, J
Yash Pal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Hp – Respondent
CWPOA No.4011 of 2020 | CWPOA No.6528 of 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Adarsh Kumar Vashista
For the Respondents: Vishwa Deep Sharma, Pushpender Kumar

An employer is not legally bound to fill future vacancies from a previously prepared promotion panel; they may initiate a fresh selection process when new vacancies arise and new candidates become eligible, provided seniority is respected.

Headnote:(A) Himachal Pradesh, Elementary Education Department, Trained Graduate Teacher, Class-III (Non-Gazetted), Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2009 - Rule 10, 11 - Promotion to TGT (Arts) - 15% quota - Vacancies arising after preparation of tentative panel - Eligibility of candidates - Whether fresh panel can be initiated. (Paras 8, 9)

(B) Service Law - Promotion - Panel validity - Whether an employer is bound to fill future vacancies from an expired or existing panel - Held, candidates have a right to be considered, but the employer may initiate fresh selection for vacancies arising subsequent to the panel's creation, provided the process is fair and considers all eligible seniority. (Paras 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, Junior Basic Teachers (JBTs), challenged the State's action of preparing a new tentative promotion panel in 2017 for TGT (Arts) positions, arguing that an earlier panel from 2016 was still valid for one year. The State contended that the new panel was necessary to fill vacancies that arose after November 2016 and to include seniors who qualified the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) after the initial panel was formed.

Findings of Court:
The court held that while a panel may have a life span, it does not mandate filling future vacancies from it. The State acted within its authority to invite fresh names for vacancies arising after the initial panel was exhausted. Seniority must be respected, and eligible candidates who passed TET subsequently cannot be ignored.

Issues: Whether the State was legally barred from preparing a new promotional panel before the expiration of the previous one and whether candidates on an existing panel have an indefeasible right to appointment against future vacancies.

Ratio Decidendi: An employer is not obligated to fill future vacancies from a previously prepared panel if that panel was created for specific prior vacancies. New eligible candidates and fresh vacancies justify a new selection process, provided the seniority of eligible candidates is duly considered.

Result: Petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. background facts and petitioner grievances regarding promotion panels. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. examination of recruitment and promotion rules and eligibility requirements. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. employer discretion to initiate fresh selection for subsequent vacancies. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

By way of present petition(s), the petitioner(s) have prayed for the following substantive relief(s):-

“ In CWPOA No.4011 of 2020

(i) That the Respondents may kindly be directed to consider the Applicant for promotion against the posts of TGT(Arts) against 15% quota on the basis of tentative panel of TET pass in service JBTs prepared and circulated by the Respondent No.2 on 17.08.2016 Annexure A-7.

(ii) In the alternative the tentative panel of TET pass in service JBT circulate by Respondents as on 05.06.2017 Annexure A-10 may kindly be quashed and set aside.

In CWPOA No.6528 of 2019

(i) That the Respondents may kindly be directed to consider the Applicants for promotion against the posts of TGT(Arts) against 15% quota on the basis of tentative panel of TET pass in service JBTs prepared and circulated by the Respondent No.2 on 17.08.2016 Annexure A-4.

(ii) In the alternative the tentative panel of TET pass in service JBT circulated by Respondents shall be 05.06.2017 Annexure A-7 may kindly be quashed and set aside and the same may be directed to be re-drawn by recokning the seniority from the date of acquisition of eligibility.”

2. For the purpose of adjudicating the claim in petition(s), the facts of CWPOA No.6528 of 2019 are taken.

3. The precise grouse of the petitioners as averred in the writ petition is that they are working as Junior Basic Teachers (for short “JBT”) with the respondents-State and all of them are qualified Bachelor of Arts (for short “B.A.”) along with Bachelor of Education (for short “B.Ed.”) from duly recognized universities and institutions. As per the Recruitment and Promotion Rules, called as the Himachal Pradesh, Elementary Education Department, Trained Graduate Teacher, Class-III (Non-Gazetted), Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2009 (for short “R&P Rules, 2009”), the post of Trained Graduate Teachers, Arts (for short “TGT Arts”), can be filled up 25% by promotion (15% from JBT & 10% from C&V) and 75% by direct recruitment on regular basis or recruitment on contract basis. A person who is having B.A./B.Com. with at least 50% marks and one year B.Ed. or other qualifications as prescribed and had passed Teacher Eligibility Test (for short “TET”) conducted by the HP Subordinate Services Selection Board, in accordance with guidelines framed by NCTE for the purpose, is eligible to be appointed against the post of TGT Arts. However, a person who is appointed as JBT can be considered against 15% quota meant for promotion with essential qualification of atleast five years regular service or regular combined with continuous adhoc service rendered, if any, in the grade. The petitioners have averred that since they were having the aforementioned essential qualifications, the respondents-State had prepared a tentative panel of TET pass in-service JBTs to be considered for promotion to the post of TGT (Arts) against 15% quota as on 31.07.2016. Vide communication dated 17.08.2016 (Annexure A-4), all the Deputy Directors of Elementary Education, Himachal Pradesh were directed to bring to the notice of all the eligible candidates the tentative penal and objections were sought till 31.08.2016 and thereafter no objections will be entertained. The tentative panel was also uploaded on the departmental website. The petitioners have pleaded that out of the said panel only 159 posts of TGTs were filled up and the candidates figuring after 159 were not promoted and the respondents initiated the fresh process, when it had called the names of TGT panel amongst TET pass in-service JBTs possessing B.A./B.Com. & B.Ed. as per the existing R&P Rules for promotion as TGT (Arts) in the year 2017 (Annexure A-6).

4. The resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top