IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
JOGINDER PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP AND OTHERS – Respondent
CRMMO/235/2026
##PAGE1##
2026:HHC:13740
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHI.MLA
Cr.MMO No.235 of 2026
Date of Decision: 27.04.2026
_________________________________________________________._________________
Joginder Pal ……...Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Others …....Respondents
Coram f
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
__________________________________________________________________________
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashrok Kumar Verma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. uRajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional
Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan,
oDeputy Advocate General, for State.
Mr. Piyush Chandel, Advocate, for respondents
C No.2 and 3.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sh arma, J. (Oral)
By way of present petition filed under Section 528 of the BNSS,
2023, prayer has been made by the petitioner-accused for quashing of FIR
iNo.322 of 2023, dated 21.12.2023, registered at Police Station Haroli,
District Una, Himachal Pradesh, under Sections 279, 337 and 304-A of IPC
and Section 181 of Motor Vehicles Act, along with consequential
proceedings pending in the competent Court of law, on the basis of
compromise.
2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the record are
that FIR sought to be quashed in the instant proceedings, came to be
lodged at the behest of respondent No.2-Mr. Harminedr Singh (hereinafter,
::: Downloaded on - 27/04/2026 19:00:09 :::CIS
##PAGE2##2026:HHC:13740
2
‘complainant’), who alleged that on 21.12.2023, while he wa.s at his
vegetable shop, Panjwar, one Brezza car bearing registration No.HP-36-E-
1054, hit one white colored scooty bearing No.HP-19-D-8537, being driven
by the deceased Kashmir Singh, as a result thereof, he fell on the ground
and suffered multiple injuries. Though petitfioner with the help of local
people took the deceased to the nearby hospital, but unfortunately he
succumbed to the injuries. In the afore background, FIR, detailed
hereinabove, came to be lodged argainst the petitioner.
3. Though after completion of investigation, Police has already
presented Challan in the competent Court of law, but before same could be
taken to its logical end, parties to the lis have decided to settle the dispute
amicably inter se them by way of compromise placed on record and as
such, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings,
praying therein to quash and set aside the FIR as well as consequent
iproceedings pending before the competent Court of law.
4. In terms of order dated 30.03.2026, respondent-State has filed
status report, which is silent about compromise. In terms of afore order,
complainant as well as respondent No.3, i.e. wife of deceased, have come
present and are being represented by Mr. Piyush Chandel, Advocate.
Complainant states on oath that he of his own volition and without there
being any external pressure, has come before this Court to make
statement. He states that parties have entered into compromise, whereby
::: Downloaded on - 27/04/2026 19:00:09 :::CIS
##PAGE3##2026:HHC:13740
3
they have resolved to settle their dispute amicably inter se them. .He states
that though he had no occasion to see the accident with his eyes, but he
had reached on the spot after having heard loud noise and as such, he is
not in a position to state whether accident occurred on account of rash and
negligent driving of the petitioner or not. Hfe states that since family of
deceased has already settled the matter with the petitioner, who has duly
compensated them, he does not wish to prosecute the case further and
shall have no objection in caser FIR in question as well as consequential
proceedings pending in the competent Court of law are quashed and set
aside and the petitioner is acquitted of the offences alleged in the FIR.
While admitting cContents of the compromise to be correct, he also admits
his signatures thereupon. His statement made on oath is taken on record.
5. Respondent No.3, i.e. wife of the deceased, also stat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.