Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J
Anuj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of HP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. alleged harassment leading to wife's suicide by poison. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on innocence, parity, prior rejection. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. subsequent bail requires material change in circumstances. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. no evidence appreciation or trial delay at bail stage. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. petition dismissed for lack of changed circumstances. (Para 22) |
Anuj Kumar …. Petitioner Versus State of HP …. Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Petitioner : Mr Mohit Dogra, Advocate.
For the Respondent/State: Mr Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General.
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge H The petitioner has filed the present petition for seeking regular bail in FIR No. 4 of 2025 dated 15.01.2025 registered at Police Station Sihunta, District Chamba, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 85 and 108 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nayay Sanhita (BNS), 2023.
2. It has been asserted that the petitioner hails from a respectable family and commands good respect in the locality. He was falsely
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
