IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
TARA CHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP – Respondent
CRMPM/380/2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No.380 of 2026
Date of Decision: 27.4.2026
_____________________________________________________________________
Tara Chand
……...Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh
…....Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? Yes.
For the Petitioner: Mr. Somesh Sharma, Legal Aid Counsel.
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional
Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr.
C Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sh arma, J. (Oral)
hBail petitioner namely Tara Chand, who is 44 years old and is
behgind bars since 21.5.2025, has approached this court in the instant
proceedings filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
Sanhita, 2023, for grant of regular bail, in case FIR No. 46 of 2025 dated
21.5.2025, registered at Police Station Nirmand, District Kullu, Himachal
Pradesh, under Sections 64(1), 333 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023 (in short “BNS”).
::: Downloaded on - 28/04/2026 23:02:39 :::CIS
##PAGE2##2
2. Respondent-State has filed the status report under the
signature of SHO, PS Nirmand, District Kullu, Himachal Pradesh, who has
come present with record. Record perused and returned.
3. Close scrutiny of record/status report reveals that on
21.5.2025, complainant lodged a complaint at afore Police Station, alleging
therein that on 5.5.2025, her mother, who is 65 years old i.e. victim-
prosecutrix, was sexually assaulted a gainst her wish by the petitioner. She
alleged that her mother residers in the village alone and on the date of
alleged incident, bail petitioner forcibly entered the house and sexually
assaulted her against oher wishes. In the afore background, FIR detailed
herein above, camCe to be lodged against the petitioner on 21.5.2025 and
since then, he is behind the bars. Since investigation in the case is
completeh and nothing remains to be recovered from him, bail petitioner has
approached this Court in the instant proceedings for grant of regular bail.
4. While fairly admitting factum with regard to filing of the challan
in the competent court of law, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional
Advocate General, states that though nothing remains to be recovered from
the bail petitioner, but keeping in view the gravity of offence alleged to have
been committed by him, he does not deserves any leniency. He states that
there is overwhelming evidence on record suggestive of the fact that
::: Downloaded on - 28/04/2026 23:02:39 :::CIS
##PAGE3##3
accused taking advantage of old age of victim-prosecutrix, .not only
extended threats to her, but also sexually assaulted her against her wishes,
as such, prayer made by the petitioner for grant of bail, deserves outright
rejection. While admitting factum with regard to recording of statement of
victim-prosecutrix, learned Additional Advocate General states that trial is
at an advance stage and as such, it would not be in the interest of justice to
enlarge the petitioner on bail, because in that event, he may cause harm to
the victim-prosecutrix. r
5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
material available on roecord, this Court finds that allegedly incident took
place on 5.5.202C5, but report qua the same came to be lodged on
21.5.2025, by daughter of the victim-prosecutrix, who alleged that on the
date of hthe alleged incident, at about 10:00pm, bail petitioner forcibly
entered the room of the victim-prosecutrix, who was living alone at her
house, and thereafter, sexually assaulted her against her wishes. He also
extended threats to victim-prosecutrix that if she discloses the afore fact to
anybody, she will face the consequences. Since medical of the victim-
prosecutrix was conducted after 15 days of the alleged incident, no cogent
and convincing evidence came forth qua the alleged incident of rape.
Statement of victim-prosecutrix has already been recorded in the trial
::: Down
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.