IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No. 677 of 2025.

Decided on :28 ^th April, 2026 .

Dharamveer ...Petitioner Versus Raj Krishan & Ors. ....Respondents.

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Romesh Verma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Vishal Panwar, Advocate.

Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral).

The present petition arises out of order as passed by learned District Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 22-CMA/14 of 2024 on 08.10.2025, whereby the appeal preferred by the plaintiff/petitioner has been dismissed and the order as passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan dated

30.09.2024 has been affirmed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the present petitioner/plaintiff filed a suit for grant of a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against the present respondents/defendants. As per the claim as put forward by the plaintiff, he is owner in possession

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

of Plot No. 14, situated in Housing Board Colony, Nahan District Sirmur H.P. It has been averred that the pl