IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CARBC No.29 of 2026 Decided on: 28.04.2026 P The Learning Curve Educational Trust … Petitioner Versus The Indian Institute of Technology … Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, fJudge.

Whether approved for reporting?^{1 Yes} ____________________________________________________ _

For the petitioner: Mr. Ank ush Dass Sood, Senior Advocate, with tMr. Vinay Kumar Pandey, Advocate.

For the respondents: Mrs. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate, Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate and Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate.

Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)

By way of this petition, filed under Section 9 of the Ahrbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for interim measures, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:- “a) That an Order restraining the Respondents from disturbing the possession of the Petitioner where the petitioner is running the school and the status quo may kindly be maintained with as it exists on regard to status and rights of the parties today, until the conclusion of the arbitration proceedings may kindly be passed in the interest of justice.

b) Direction