IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CMPMO No. 184 of 2026 Decided on: 30.4.2026 Kulbhushan Sharma … Petitioner Versus Canara Bank & ors.

f …Respondents _____________________________ ______________

Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge Whether approved for reporting?

___________________________________________________ For the Petitioneru: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate.

For the Respoondent : Ms. Jyoti Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for respondent No.

1.

Virender Singh, Judge (oral )

Notice confined to respondent No. 1. Ms. Jyoti Chauhan, Advocate appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No. 1.

2. Petitioner Kulbhushan Sharma, has filed the present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 26.2.2026, passed by the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Mandi, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’), in Civil Suit No. 95 of 2021, titled as, ‘Canara Bank versus M/s K.B.

Trading Co. & others’.

3. By way of order dated 26.2.2026, the learned trial Court has closed the evidence of the petitioner.

4. For the sake of convenience, parties to the lis are hereinafter referred to, in the samfe mann