2026:HHC:14423 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Arb. Case No. 814/2024 Reserved on: 16.04.2026 Decided on: 04.05.20P26 M/s Naveen Auto Store Sole Proprietary …..Petitioner Versus Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. & ors. ….Respondents ______________________________________________________________

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rromesh Verma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioneor: Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Subhash Chander, Advocate.

Romesh Verma, Judge g The present petition has been filed by the ipetitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for brevity, the Act) for grant of interim directions.

2. The brief facts, for the adjudication of the instant petition, are that the petitioner is a Sole Proprietorship concern having its office-cum workshop, near UCO Bank, Ghumarwin, District, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh. It is averred in the

1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

petition that the respondents were in need of Service Station for their vehicles at Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur H.P. They issued an advertisement in Punjab Kesari