IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA LPA No. 219 of 2026 Date of decision: 21.04.2026.

Uploaded on: 28.04.H2026 State of H.P. & another ...Appellants.

Versus f Roshan Lal & another ...Respondents.

Coram: t The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice.

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Cappellants : Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General.

For the respondents : Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Bipin Chander Negi, Judge The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment dated 17.09.2025, passed in CWPOA No. 5517 of 2019, filed by respondent No. 1, whereby the said respondent has been held entitled to pensionary benefits, in accordance with CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 w.e.f. the date of retirement by taking into account the qualifying service of the said respondent from

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

the date the respondent had joined the Himachal Pradesh General Industries Corporation Ltd., as a regular employee along with all consequential benefits.

2. Respondent No. 1 in the case at hand had worked as daily wage Driller in the Mining Proj