IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No.153 of 2018 Decided on: 22.04.2026 Rajinder Sharma & anr. … Appellants Versus Mohd. Latif (deceased) through LRs and anr. … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?

1 ________________________________________________________

For the appellants u: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate.

For the respondents : Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate.

Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral)

The present appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Chivil Procedure arises out of the judgment and decree dated g31.08.2017 as passed by the learned Additional District Judge, iSirmour at Nahan (H.P), (hereinafter referred to as “the First Appellate Court”), whereby the appeal filed by defendant No.2/counter claimant was allowed and the suit filed by the plaintiffs/present appellants was partly decreed and the judgment and decree dated 20/08/2014 as passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.1, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Trial Court’) was modified, whereby

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

the suit file