SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(HP) 2250

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA


LPA No.228 of 2026


Decided on : 23.04.2026

Uploaded on :24.04.2026


State of Himachal Pradesh and Others

…… Appellants

Versus

Raman Kumar and Others

…… Respondents


Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge


Whether approved for reporting?1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?


For the Appellants : Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General.

Petitioner Advocates:AG Seema Sharma ,Respondent Advocate:

G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice

(Oral)

The present appeal filed against the judgment of learned Single Judge, passed in CWP No.2557 of 2025, titled Raman Kumar and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, dated 29.08.2025, is a classic case of the State Government in digging in its heels and not applying its mind inspite of the fact that the matter stood settled conclusively by the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench on an earlier occasion in CWP No.1007 of 2023, titled Sunil Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others and CWP No.4365 of 2023, titled Prakash Chand and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 31.05.2024 (Annexure P-8). Therein, the employees of Shri Sarswati Sanskrit College, Dangar, District Bilaspur had approached this Court, on the ground that vide notification dated 17.06.2021 (Annexure P-5), the said Institute had been taken over by the State Government and renamed as Government Sanskrit College, Dangar. Accordingly, the employees had sought the relief that vide notification dated 25.08.1994, as per Clause-7, the services of the qualified teaching and non-teaching staff employed one year earlier who fulfill prescribed departmental recruitment and promotion rule condittions, prevalent at the time of taking over, would be considered for taking over. The relevant date as per the Clause is the date of taking over.

2. The Division Bench had rejected the defence taken by the State which was the revocation of the earlier notification and resultantly had directe d consideration strictly in accordance with Clause-7 of the notification dated 24.08.1994. Resultantly, the order dated 06.01.2025 came to be passed by the Secretary Education to the Government of Himachal Pradesh who rejected the case of the writ petitioners, present respondents in this appeal on the ground that they were not permanent employees of the College on the date of inspection, i.e., 10.04.2019 and having been made permanent on 01.08.2018 and 28.01.2019. Apparently, there was total non application of mind by the said Officer who only reproduced the operating part of the judgment for consideration without examining the judgment in sum and substance, which reads as under:-

“7. The State Government has issued a notification dated 25.08.1994, whereby the terms and conditions for taking over privately managed colleges in the Pradesh (affiliated) including Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff have been framed. Clause-7 of aforesaid terms and . conditions reads as under:-

"(7) The services of only qualified teaching and non-teaching staff appointed one year earlier who fulfil, prescribed departmental recruitment and promotion rule conditions, prevalent at the time of taking over will be considered for taking over subject to the approval of the State Public Service Commission or Departmental Screening Committee from the date of taking over. The services of the Principal w ill be taken over only us Senior most Lecturer of the College concerned subject to above mentioned the proviso. The Government scales in respect of the respectivue categories shall be permissible to them after the take over.”

8. In CWP No. 1007 of 2023, petitioner has filed CMP No. 7348 of 2024 and has placed on record a copy of communication dated 07.11.2022 from Principal, Government Sanskrit College, Dangar, to Director of Higher Education, H.P. No rebuttal was sought to be g placed on record by the respondents/State to the aforesaid communication dated 07.11.2022 from Principal, Government Sanskrit College Dangar, to the Director of Higher Education.

9. It is evidently clear from the aforesaid correspondence dated 07.11.2022 that all the petitioners had been working with the Sanskrit College for more than one year before the issuance of notification dated 17.06.2021 whereby the said college has been taken over by the State. In addition, it is also clear from the said communication that all the petitioners co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top