SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(HP) 2285

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Court on its own motion – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others – Respondent
CWPIL No.40 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sneh Bhimta
For the Respondents: Anup Rattan, Rakesh Dhaulta, Sandeep Dutta, Balram Sharma, Rajeev Sharma

The court highlighted the necessity of adequate air connectivity for hilly states to support tourism and resident mobility, questioning the exclusion of the state capital from the Regional Connectivity Scheme (UDAN).

Headnote:(A) Public Interest Litigation - Air Connectivity - Right to adequate transport infrastructure in hilly terrains - Failure to provide regular flights to the state capital under the Regional Connectivity Scheme (RCS) constitutes a lack of adequate connectivity affecting residents and tourism. (Para 11, 12)

(B) Administrative Accountability - Union of India - Duty to ensure equitable distribution of benefits under the UDAN Scheme - Necessity of explaining the exclusion of the state capital from connectivity benefits. (Para 10, 13)

Issues: Whether the Union of India is obligated to provide adequate air connectivity to the state capital of Himachal Pradesh under the Regional Connectivity Scheme.

The scope of the present Public Interest Litigation was expanded on 11.11.2025 by passing the following order:-

“Though the present petition was initially dealing with the ground of bird menace as such at Kangra/Gaggal Airport, but we expand the scope of CWPIL.

2. We are informed that the State of Himachal Pradesh has three airports i.e. at Shimla, Kullu and Kangra. However, in spite of the said infrastructure having been set up, apparently the Union of India has not made adequate arrangements for sufficient number of flights to operate from the said airports and thereby causing grave inconvenience to the residents of Himachal Pradesh. Especially, more so, keeping in view the fact that being a hilly State, it is difficult to commute, and for the State, the tourism industry is its main revenue earning mode.

3. We are informed that at Shimla and Kullu, there is usually only one flight operating on a hopping basis, and even the regularity pattern is also not followed.

4. Accordingly, we request Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, to assist the Court also on the abovesaid aspect. Copy of the paper book be supplied to her along with earlier orders passed.

5. Resultantly, we implead Union of India, through its Secretary, Ministry of Civil Aviation, Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan, Block B, Jorbagh Safdarjung Airport Area, New Delhi, as respondent No.7, to give the necessary details.

6. Notice. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, appears and accepts service of notice on behalf of respondent No.7.

7. Counsel for the State is directed to file a status report as to what request it has made to the concerned authorities for ensuring regular flights to the said airports.

8. To come up on 16.12.2025.”

The affidavit filed on behalf of thoe Ministry of Civil Aviation, Union of India through its Under Secretary would go on to show that the Central Government has developed and operationalized Shimla and Kullu Airporuts by allocating budget of Rs.116.70 Crore and Rs.37.29 Crores respectively under the Regional Connectivity Scheme (RCS). However, there is no mention in the affidavit regarding how much has been spent on the development of the Airport at Kangra, but it is stated that the said Airport is connected to Delhi and Chandigarh with 50 weekly flight movements operated by M/s IndiGo and M/s Spicejet. Regarding Kullu, it has been stated that the said Airport is also connected to Dehradun, Delhi and Jaipur with 16 weekly flight movements operated by M/s Alliance Air.

It is admitted that there is no scheduled flight operations at Shimla as the Alliance Air has stopped its operations due to the grounding and shortage of aircrafts, but it may re-commence its flight operations on aircraft availability. It has been mentioned that the Airports are suitable only for small aircraft like ATR-42, ATR-72 and Q400 and there is limited availability of such aircrafts with the airlines in the country. It has also been averred that the airlines operators are to introduce air services from any airport in the country depending upon their operational and commercial viability.

The affidavit of the State filed today througHh its Special Secretary (Tourism & Civil Aviation) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, however, specifies tfhat Shimla is the only State capital, which is yet to be connected under the Regional Connectivity Scheme, whereas all other States are connected. The modified UDAN Scheme announced by the Union of India in the Union Budget 2026-27 also excludes the said benefit and no routes have been allocated for the Delhi-Shimla-Delhi and Shimla-Dharamshala-Shimla sectors by the Central Government. The State’s limited financial capacity also handicaps it not making it feasible to continue providing Viability Gap Fund (VGF) for long in future. It has been averred that the respondents/ State has granted an amount of Rs.32,64,62,400/-, as per the Memorandum of Understanding signed on 05.04.2026 with the Alliance Air Aviation Ltd. as a Viability Gap Fund.

Keeping in view the cont

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top