IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

FAO (MVA) No. 133 of 2014 Reserved on : 18.04.2026 Decided on : 30.04.2026 Dr. Renu Rattan ...Appellant Versus Savita Parashar and others ...Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?

For the appellant: Ms. Kritika, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate.

For the respondents: None for respondent No.

1.

Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate, for respondent No. 2.

Virender Singh, Judge.

Appellant-Dr. Renu Rattan has filed the present appeal, under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the M.V. Act’), being dissatisfied with the award dated 06.01.2014, passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (III), Shimla, H.P. (hereinafter

Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

referred to as ‘the MACT’), in MAC Petition No. 56-

S/2 of 2012/08, titled as “Dr. Renu Rattan Vers.us Smt. Savita Parashar & anr.”.

2. Vide award dated 06.01.2H014, the learned MACT has allowed the petition, filed by the appellant and awarded a compensation of Rs. 3,20,000/-, along with interest, at the rate of 12% per annum, fro