IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
VISHAL MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP AND OTHERS – Respondent
CWP/7780/2026
##PAGE1##
1
CWP No. 7780 of 2026
Decided on: 18.05.2026
Vishal Mehta …..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P & others ..Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy
Advocate General, for
respondents No. 1 & 2.
o Mr. Surinder Kumar Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.4.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
At the oral request made by learned counsel
for the petitioner, the State Election Commission through
its Secretary is impleaded as respondent No.4.
2. Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned
Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Surinder Kumar
Sharma, learned counsel, appear and waive service of
notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 2 and 4,
respectively.
3. In view of grievance of the petitioner, the
submission made by learned counsel for the parties and
also keeping in view an urgency urged in view of
1
Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
::: Downloaded on - 18/05/2026 20:07:07 :::CIS
##PAGE2##2
notification issued on 29.04.2026 by respondent No.4,
publishing the election schedule for ensuing elections to
the State Panchayati Raj institutions, with the consent of
learned counsel for the parties, the matter has been
heard at this stage without calling for replies Hfrom the
appearing respondents and without issuing notices to
respondent No.3/ the complainant.
4. Petitioner presented his nomination for
contesting election to the ofÏce of Pardhan, Gram
Panchayat, Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushahr, District
Shimla, H.P. Respondent No.3 filed objections to
petitioner’s candidature on 12.05.2026 on the ground that
petitioner’s father had encroached government land.
Learnedh counsel for the petitioner pointed out to
Anngexure P-3, which is an application purportedly filed by
petitioner’s father (registered as case No.1085/2002) for
regularizing the encroachment statedly made by him,
given Ex. No.PW5/A and submitted that Annexure P-3 was
the document placed on record by respondent No.3
before the Assistant Returning OfÏcer/ respondent No.2
alongwith her objections.
Petitioner filed reply to the objections
(Annexure P-4). Considering the complaint, as also,
response thereto, respondent No.2 rejected petitioner’s
::: Downloaded on - 18/05/2026 20:07:07 :::CIS
##PAGE3##3
nomination on 13.05.2026 (Annexure P-5) on the ground
that petitioner’s father had applied for regularization of
land mentioned therein.
Learned counsel for the petitioner points out
that petitioner had contested the elections for thHe post of
Up-Pardhan, Gram Panchayat, Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur
Bushahr, District Shimla, H.P. in the year, 2021 and
emerged successful therein. His elections were put to
question by respondent No.3 by filing Election Petition in
case No. 11-3/2021 which was dismissed by the Sub-
Divisional OfÏcer (C), Rampur Bushahr, Tehsil Shimla on
19.07.2024 holding that petitioner therein (present
respondent No.3) had failed to establish any substantial
ground h for disqualification of respondent No.1 (present
petgitioner). The order dated 19.07.2024 also refers to file
No. 1085/2002 exhibited therein as PW5/A and inter alia
makes following observations:-
“In view of the above, I have carefully and
meticulously gone through the petition, perused
evidence so led by the parties and arguments
advanced by both the parties. Firstly the main
contention of the petitioner in her petition is that
the father of respondent No.1 has encroached
upon government land, which would disqualify the
respondent from contesting the election for the
post of Up-Pardhan. However, upon examining the
evidence presented by both the parties, it was
found that the petitioner failed to provide
sufÏcient documentary proof or credible
testimony to substantiate the claim that the
::: Downloaded on - 18/05/2026 20:07:07 :::CIS
#
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.