IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
2026:HHC:17299
CWP No. 5091 of 2026
Balwant Singh … Petitioner
Versus
H.P.S.E.B.L. through its Under Secoretary and others … Respondents
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Decided on: 15.05.2026
For the petitioner : Ms. Parul Negi, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate for respondent-Board.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
May 15, 2026
(narender)
2026:HHC:17299 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 5091 of 2026 Decided on: 15.05.2026
Balwant Singh … Petitioner
Versus H.P.S.E.B.L. through its Under Secoretary
and others … Respondents Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 Yes _____________________________________________________
For the petitioner : Ms. Parul Negi, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate for respondent-Board.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for
quashing of transfer order dated 25.03.2026, in terms whereof, he has been transferred from Electrical Sub Division Bhaderwar under
iElectrical Division HPSEBL Sarkaghat, to Electrical Sub Division, HPSEBL, Keylong.
2. Today, when the case was taken up for consideration, learned Counsel for the respondents-Board has handed over an office order passed by the respondent-Authority dated 08.05.2026, in terms whereof, the representation of the petitioner, which was pending with the Authority for consideration to be transferred to
some other station, has been rejected.
::: Downloaded on - 18/05/2026 20:26:00 :::CIS
##PAGE2##2
2026:HHC:17299
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that in terms of the impugned transfer order, the petitioner stands transferred to Keylong not because of any administrative exigency or public interest but as a result of a request generated by the private respondent in terms of Annexure P-2 appended with the writ
petition. t
4. Ms. Parul Negi, learned Counsel for the petitioner has taken the Court through the documents appended with the petition, including Annexure P-2 and submitted that the documents appended therewith demonstrate that the private respondent reques ted the Hon’ble Chief Minister to undertake certain transfers, which included the transfer of the petitioner from his present place of posting to Keylong or Shimla. As a result thereof, respondent- Board passed the impugned transfer order, transferring the petitioner from his present place of posting to Keylong. She submitted that above demonstrates that the impugned transfer order was not passed by the respondent-Board by applying its independent mind as to whether the petitioner deserved to be transferred from his present place of posting to Keylong or not but it simply obliged the private respondent by accepting his demand of
the transfer of the petitioner to a Tribal area.
5. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondent-
::: Downloaded on - 18/05/2026 20:26:00 :::CIS
##PAGE3##3
2026:HHC:17299
Board submitted that the petitioner has already completed his normal tenure at the present place of posting and his transfer to Keylong was due to administrative exigency. He has also submitted that irrespective of the fact that as to what was the reason to initiate the transfer, fact of the matter is that the petitioner having completed his normal tenure tat the present place of posting, has no inherent right to continue to serve at the said station. He further submitted that the transfer has been effected by following the process, as is in vogue, by the respondent-Board and therefore, as
there is no merit in the present petition, the same be dismissed.
6. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties and have also carefully gone through the order passed by the Authority on
08.05.2026 as well as the documents appended with the petition.
7. The petitioner in terms of the impugned transfer order stands transferred from Electrical Sub Division Bhaderwar under Electrical Division HPSEBL Sarkaghat to Electrical Sub Division,
HPSEBL, Keylong.
8. Annexure P-2 demonstrates that the private respondent sought transfer of the petitioner from Bhaderwar to Keylong or
Shimla.
9. On a query put to learned Counsel for the respondent- Board, as to who is the private respondent, the Court was informed
::: Downloaded on - 18/05/2026 20:26:00 :::CIS
##PAGE4##4
2026:H
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.