IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. 57 of 2006 Reserved on: 24.03.2026 Date of Decision: 14.05.2026 Jagdish (deceased) through LRs ...Appellants.

Versus Inder Singh & Ors ...Respondents.

Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ No For the Appellants : Mr Deepak Gupta, Advocate.

For Respondents No.1 &2 : Mr Ashwani Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr Ishan Sharma, Advocate.

For Respondents No. 3 & 4 : Mr Mohinder Verma, i Advocate.

For Respondents No. 5 & 6 : Proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 14.06.2016 For Respondents No.7 to 11 : None.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 24.09.2005 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur (learned Appellate Court) vide which the judgment and decree dated 01.03.1995 passed by

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

the learned Sub Judge First Class, Ghumarwin, H.P. (learned Trial Court) were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the pr