IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Santoshi Devi AND ANR – Respondent
CR.R/557/2025
##PAGE1##
2026:HHC:17102
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. Revision No.557 of 2025
Date of Decision: 14.05.2026
__________________________________________________________________________
Vinod Kumar ……...Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Santoshi Devi and Another …....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judgef.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Vikas Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General, with
Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy
Advocates General, for State.
__________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Instant criminal revision petition filed under Section 438 read
with Section 442 of the BNSS, lays challenge to judgment dated
13.08.20h25, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sarkaghat,
Disgtrict Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, Camp at Joginder Nagar, in Criminal
Appeal No.24/2024, titled Vinod Kumar Vs. Smt. Santoshi Devi, affirming
judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 06.11.2024, passed by
the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi,
Himachal Pradesh, whereby the learned trial Court while holding the
petitioner-accused (hereinafter, ‘accused’) guilty of having committed
offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in
short the “Act"), convicted and sentenced him to undergo simple
::: Downloaded on - 18/05/2026 23:28:09 :::CIS
##PAGE2##2026:HHC:17102
-2-
imprisonment for a period of one year and pay compensation to the tune of
₹60,000/- to the complainant. P
2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge fro.m the record are
that respondent-complainant (hereinafter, ‘complainant’) instituted a
complaint under Section 138 of the Act, in the Court of learned Judicial
Magistrate First Class, Joginder Nagar, Disotrict Mandi, Himachal Pradesh,
alleging therein that accused with a view to discharge his liability issued
Cheque for a sum of Rs.38,388/-, but fact remains that aforesaid Cheque
on its presentation, was diushonoured. Since petitioner-accused failed to
make the payment goood within the time stipulated in the legal notice,
respondent/complainant was compelled to initiate proceedings before the
competent Court of law under Section 138 of the Act.
3. hLearned trial Court on the basis of material adduced on record
by the respective parties, vide judgment/order dated 06.11.2024, held the
petitioner-accused guilty of having committed offence under Section 138 of
the Act and accordingly, convicted and sentenced him, as per the
description given hereinabove.
4. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid judgment of
conviction recorded by the Court below, accused preferred an appeal in the
Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sarkaghat, District Mandi,
Himachal Pradesh, Camp at Joginder Nagar, which also came to be
::: Downloaded on - 18/05/2026 23:28:09 :::CIS
##PAGE3##2026:HHC:17102
-3-
dismissed vide judgment dated 13.08.2025, as a consequence of which,
judgment of conviction recorded by the learned trial Court came to be
upheld. In the aforesaid background, petitioner-accused. has approached
this Court by way of instant proceedings, seeking therein his acquittal after
setting aside the judgments of conviction recorded by the Courts below.
5. Before case at hand could beo heard and decided on its own
merits, parties have entered into compromise, whereby
respondent/complainant has agreed to settle the dispute with the
petitioner/accused. Counselu representing the petitioner, on instructions
from the petitioner, staotes that amount lying deposited with the trial Court
has been agreed to be released in favour of respondent/complainant and
besides above, he has already paid sum of Rs.42,000/- to the
respondehnt/complainant outside the Court. He states that since
petitioner/accused has agreed to pay entire compensation amount, as per
compromise, detailed hereinabove, this Court, while exercising power u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.