##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr.A.(A-SB)-15 of 2025

Date of Decision: 14.05.2026

__________________________________________________________________________

Rohit Hooda ……...Appellant

Versus

M/s S.R. Infotech and Another …....Respondents

Coram

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. f

Whether approved for reporting?

__________________________________________________________________________

For the Appellant: Mr. Maan Stingh, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Sandeep Sharma, J. (Ooral)

Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with order dated 26.07.2025

passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Manali, District Kullu,

Himachahl Pradesh, whereby complaint No.169/2018, titled Rohit Hooda

Vs.g M/s S.R. Infotech, came to be dismissed in default, appellant-

complainant has approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed

under Section 419 of the BNSS, 2023, praying therein to set aside the

aforesaid order and restore the complaint filed under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. Learned counsel representing the appellant fairly states that on

account of some unavoidable circumstances, appellant/complainant was

unable to come present on the date of passing of the impugned order and

::: Downloaded on - 18/05/2026 23:32:14 :::CIS

2

he was under impression that his counsel will come present and seek

further time, however, Court below, taking note of his absence, dismissed

the complaint for non-appearance and non-prosecution. .

3. To the contrary, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, learned counsel

for the respondents-accused, supported the impugned order. He submitted

that since complainant had not come presoent to pursue his complaint, no

illegality can be said to have been committed by the Court below, while

passing impugned order. He submitted that in criminal proceedings

complainant and accused, uunless exempted, are always under obligation to

put in appearance on eoach and every date.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused

material adduced on record, this Court finds that on 26.07.2025, case was

listed forh the appearance of complainant. No doubt, perusal of the zimni

order placed on record reveals that on 26.07.2025, matter was repeatedly

called throughout the day, enabling complainant to come present, but

certainly trial Court ought not have straightway proceeded to dismiss the

complaint in default, rather in such a situation, Court could either issue

fresh notice to the complainant or his counsel, specifically calling upon him

to come present or his counsel, or could have adjourned the matter.

5. At this stage, it would be apt to take note of Section 279 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which reads as under:-

::: Downloaded on - 18/05/2026 23:32:14 :::CIS

3

“279. Non-appearance or death of complainant.

(1)If the summons has been issued on complaint, and oPn the day

appointed for the appearance of the accused, or any day subsequent

thereto to which the hearing may be adjourned, the .complainant does

not appear, the Magistrate shall, after giving thirty days' time to the

complainant to be present, notwithstanding anything hereinbefore

contained, acquit the accused, unless for some reason he thinks it

proper to adjourn the hearing of the case to some other day:Provided

that where the complainant is represented by an advocate or by the

officer conducting the prosecution or where the Magistrate is of opinion

that the personal attendance of the complainant is not necessary, the

Magistrate may, dispense with his attendance and proceed with the

case.

(2)The provisions of sub-section (1) shall, so far as may be, apply also to

cases where tohe non-appearance of the complainant is due to his death.”

6. AforesCaid provision of law gives a discretion to the Magistrate

either to acquit the accused or to adjourn the case for some other day, if

he/she thinks it proper. Proviso to aforesaid Section furthe