IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROMESH VERMA
Kamli – Appellant
Versus
Amar Singh – Respondent
CMPMO/367/2023
##PAGE1##
2026:HHC:17412
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No.367 of 2023
Decided on: 13.05.2026
Kamli ….PHetitioner
Versus
Amar Singh & another ...Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verm a, Judge
Whether approved for reportingt?
For the petitioner: Mr. Arun Kumar and Mr. Bhim Raj
Sharma, Advocates.
For the respondents: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, vice
Mr.Mohan Sharma, Advocate.
Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral)
The present petition has been filed by the
dgefendant/petitioner against the judgment as passed by Additional
iDistrict Judge-I, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P., Camp at Karsog,
dated 09.06.2023, whereby the appeal filed by the
plaintiffs/respondents under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of CPC was
allowed and the parties were directed to maintain status quo qua
nature and possession of the suit property during the pendency of
the suit and the order as passed by learned Civil Judge, Karsog,
District Mandi, was set aside.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the
plaintiffs/respondents filed a suit for permanent prohibitory and
::: Downloaded on - 19/05/2026 00:33:40 :::CIS
##PAGE2##2 2026:HHC:17412
mandatory injunction against the present petitioner/defendant on
the ground that land comprised in Khewat Khatauni No.66
min/119 min Khasra No.1028, measuring 00-00-09 bighas,
situated in Mohal Balindi/144, Tehsil Karsog, District Mandi, H.P.
is described as Gair Mumkin Gawain. Thef same is recorded in
the ownership and possession of the plaintiffs and other co-
sharers as per jamabandi for the year 2018-2019. The father of
the plaintiffs had constructed cowshed over the suit land, which
was in absolute possession of the plaintiffs and the same got
burnt in the month of December 2021. The Halqua Patwari
inspected the spot for providing claim and, in this regard, took the
signature s of plaintiff No.1. Now, the defendant is going to cover
the land in the suit land by covering it through a tarpaulin.
3. As per plaintiff, it was the defendant has given her
whole share to Puran Chand and, in that regard, Rapat No.323
dated 15.12.2021 was entered. Now, the defendant wants to grab
the land of the plaintiffs for construction of a house. The plaintiffs
are senior citizens and the defendant is trying to cover the suit
land forcibly through a tarpaulin. Though, requests were made to
the defendant, but she did not pay any heed to the same. The suit
land is adjoining the road side, which is a valuable portion of the
suit land and of prime importance.
::: Downloaded on - 19/05/2026 00:33:40 :::CIS
##PAGE3##3 2026:HHC:17412
4. Along with the suit, the plaintiffs also filed an
application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC.
5. The suit was contested by the defendant by refuting
all the allegations as levelled in the plaint.
6. The defendant filed reply to tfhe application under
Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC and prayed for dismissal of the
same.
7. Learned trial Court vide its order dated 07.12.2022
dismissed the application as filed by the plaintiffs/respondents.
8. Feeling dissatisfied, the plaintiffs preferred an appeal
in the Court of learned Additional District Judge-I, Mandi, District
Mandi o n 08.12.2022. Learned first appellate Court vide its
impugned judgment dated 09.06.2023 accepted the appeal filed
by the plaintiffs and directed both the parties to maintain status
quo qua nature and possession of the suit property during the
pendency of the suit. .
9. Feeling dissatisfied, the defendant/petitioner has
approached this Court by filing the instant petition under Article
227 of the Constitution of India.
10. It is contended by Mr.Arun Kumar, learned counsel
for the petitioner, that the impugned judgment as passed by
learned first appellate Court is erroneous and liable to be
::: Downloaded on - 19/05/2026 00:33:40 :::CIS
##PAGE4##4 2026:HHC:17412
quashed and set aside. He submits that the trial Court has rightly
appreciated the point in controversy. Therefore, after accepting
the present petition, the impugned judgment passed by learned
first appellate Court deserves to be quashed and set aside and
the o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.