IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.367 of 2023 Decided on: 13.05.2026 Kamli H….Petitioner Versus Amar Singh & another ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Ve rma, Judge Whether approved for reportting?

For the petitioner: Mr. Arun Kumar and Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocates.

For the respondents: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, vice Mr.Mohan Sharma, Advocate.

Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral)

The present petition has been filed by the gdefendant/petitioner against the judgment as passed by Additional iDistrict Judge-I, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P., Camp at Karsog, dated 09.06.2023, whereby the appeal filed by the plaintiffs/respondents under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of CPC was allowed and the parties were directed to maintain status quo qua nature and possession of the suit property during the pendency of the suit and the order as passed by learned Civil Judge, Karsog, District Mandi, was set aside.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs/respondents filed a suit for permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction against the present petitioner/defendant on the ground that land comprised in Khewat Khatauni No.66 min/119 min Khasra No.1028, measuring 00-00-09 bighas, si