IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
ILYAS ALI – Appellant
Versus
BHAG SINGH – Respondent
CRMP/1758/2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MP No.1758 of 2026 in Cr.R. No.626 of 2022
Date of Decision: 13.05..2026
__________________________________________________________________P___
Ilyas Ali ……...Applicant/Petitioner
Versus
Bhag Singh …....Non-applicant/Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? f
For the Petitioner: Dr. Rajesh Kumaor Parmar, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate.
_________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
By way of instant application filed under Section 147 of
Negotiable Instruments Act (in short “Act”) read with Section 359 of
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short “BNSS”), prayer has
been made by the applicant-petitioner (in short “accused”) for
compounding of offence alleged to have been committed under Section 138
of the Act.
2. Precisely, the facts of the case as emerge from the record are
Hthat non-applicant/respondent/complainant (in short ‘complainant’) filed
a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short
‘Act’) in the competent court of law, alleging therein that accused entered
into an agreement dated 26.07.2014 with him to hire the tractor bearing
No.HR-06-R-7975 along with loader @ Rs.2000/- per day. He alleged that
agreement was reduced into writing duly attested by Notary Public and
with a view to discharge his lawful liability, accused issued Cheque bearing
No.528607 dated 04.07.2015 amounting to Rs.50,000/- drawn on State
Bank of Patiala, Branch Bhagni, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur,
::: Downloaded on - 19/05/2026 00:49:39 :::CIS
##PAGE2##2
District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, however, on presentation of aforesaid
Cheque to the Bank concerned, the same was dishonoured wit.h the
remarks “Insufficient Funds”. After receipt of aforesaid return memo,
complainant served accused with a legal notice through registered post,
however, since accused failed to make the payment good within the time
stipulated in the legal notice, respondent/complainant was compelled to
initiate proceedings under Section 138 of the Act in the Court of learned
Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nalagarh, District Solan, Himachal
Pradesh. r
3. Learned trial Court on the basis of material adduced on record
by the respective parties, vide judgment/order dated
09.08.2019/02.09.20C19, held the accused guilty of having committed
offence under Section 138 of the Act and accordingly convicted and
sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months
and pagy compensation to the tune of Rs.60,000/- to the complainant.
4 i. Though, at the first instance, accused preferred an appeal in
the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nalagarh, District Solan,
Himachal Pradesh, however, same was dismissed vide judgment dated
30.07.2022. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid judgment
passed by learned first appellate court, accused preferred Criminal
Revision No.626 of 2022 in this Court, which also came to be dismissed
vide judgment dated 18.09.2024.
5. Since after passing of aforesaid judgment dated 18.09.2024,
accused compromised the matter with the complainant, whereby accused
has paid the entire amount to the complainant, applicant-accused has
::: Downloaded on - 19/05/2026 00:49:39 :::CIS
##PAGE3##3
approached this Court in the instant application filed under Section 147 of
Negotiable Instruments Act (in short “Act”) read with Section 359 of B.NSS,
praying therein for compounding of the offence under Section 147 of the
Act.
6. While making reference to the compromise arrived inter se
parties, Dr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, learned counsel for the accused, states
that since parties have already compromised the matter, this Court, while
exercising power under Section 147 of the Act, may proceed to compound
the offence and acquit the accused frrom the charge framed against him.
7. Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, while putting in appearance on
behalf of the complainant, states that he has ins
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.