IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
Bhagirath – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP No.1773 of 2026 in Cr.R. No.857 of 2024 Date of Decision: 13..05.2026 ____________________________________________________________P______________
Sh. Bhagirath ……...Applicant/Petitioner Versus Punjab National Bank …....Non-applicant/Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Jiten der P. Ranote, Advocate.
___________________________________t______________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
By way of instant application filed under Section 147 of Negotiable Instruments Act read with Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha SanChita, 2023, prayer has been made by the applicant-accused for compounding of offence alleged to have been committed under Section
138 of the Act.
2g. Precisely, the facts of the case as emerge from the record are ithat non-applicant/respondent/complainant (for short ‘complainant’)
filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short ‘Act’) in the competent court of law, alleging therein alleging therein that accused applied for loan amounting to Rs.2,00,0
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.