SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(HP) 2589

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA


CWP Nos. 19747 & 19748/2025


Decided on: 12.05.2026.



1. CWP No. 19747/2025


Akshat Singh …..Petitioner


Versus


State of H.P and others ..Respondents


2. CWP No. 19748/2025


Akshit Ahlawat …..Petitioner


Versus


State of H.P and others ..Respondents


Coram

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua



For the Petitioners: Mr. N.S. Chandel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate.


For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1.


Mr. Arjun Lall, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 4.


Jyotsna Rewal Dua


May 12, 2026


Judge


yogesh

Petitioner Advocates:Ankit Dhiman Ruchirangad Singh ,Respondent Advocate: Arjun Lall AG Rajesh Kumar Parmar

##PAGE1##

1

( 2026:HHC:16047 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP Nos. 19747 &19748/2025 Decided on: 12.05.2026.

1. CWP No. 19747/2025

Akshat Singh …..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P and others ..Respondents

2. CWP No. 19748/2025

Akshit Ahlawat …..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P and others ..Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. N.S. Chandel, Senior Advocate

with Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Arjun Lall, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 4.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Both these writ petitions involve almost

similar questions of law and facts, hence, with consent of learned counsel for the parties have been taken up

together for adjudication.

1

Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

::: Downloaded on - 19/05/2026 01:17:50 :::CIS

##PAGE2##

2 ( 2026:HHC:16047 )

2. Petitioners in both these writ petitions are students of B.A.LL.B.(Hons.) integrated five years course in respondent- Himachal Pradesh National Law University. Both the petitioners were pursuing 7th Semester in December, 2025. Petitioner in CWP NHo.19747/2025, Akshat Singh had 57.29% attendance in the semester and the petitioner in CWP No.19748/2025, Akshit Ahlawat had 39.88% attendance. Due to shortage in the attendance, the respondent- University did not permit the petitioners to appear in end-term examination of 7th Semester and detained them in the 7th Semester in terms of Annexure P- 8 dated 06.12.2025. Feeling aggrieved, petitioners

instituted these writ petitions.

2(i). Under interim order passed on 12.12.2025 in gthese writ petitions, the petitioners were allowed to appear in the end-term examination of 7th Semester held in December, 2025 subject to their depositing an amount of ₹50,000/- each in the Registry of this Court. Such permission was not to create any equity in petitioners’ favour. Further, the respondents were directed not to declare the result of the petitioners without leave of the

Court. The order reads as under:-

“Notice in above terms. In the meanwhile, applicant/petitioner shall be allowed in the 7th Semester End-Term Examinations commencing

::: Downloaded on - 19/05/2026 01:17:50 :::CIS

##PAGE3##

3 ( 2026:HHC:16047 )

from 15.12.2025, subject to his paying an amount of Rs.50,000/- with the Registry of this Court. It is clarified that the permission which is being given to the petitioner to participate in the examination shall not create any equity in his favour. The result of the petitioner shall not be declared without the

leave of the Court.”

2(ii). Pursuant to above, both the petitioners deposited an amount of ₹50,000/- each i n the Registry of this Court and appeared in the eond-term examination of 7th Semester. The result of end-term examination of 7th Semester was produced before this Court on 10.03.2026. In terms of the resuult, both the petitioners have passed end-term examination of 7th Semester. Looking at the result, peCtitioners under order dated 20.03.2026 were allowed to provisionally attend classes of 8th Semester with the rider that attending classes of 8th Semester will not create any rights or equities in their favour.

Petitioners’ attending 8th Semester classes was to abide by the outcome of the main writ petitions.

3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has drawn attention to Rule 12 Chapter II Part IV of the Bar Council of India Rules of Legal Education, 2008, whereunder minimum 70% of classes held in the concerned subject are required to be attended for appearing in end semester test in the subject. In terms of proviso thereof, if a student for any exceptional reasons

::: Downloaded on - 19/05/2026 01:17:50 :::CIS

##PAGE4##

4 ( 2026:HHC:16047 )

fails to attend 70% of the classes held in any subj

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top