IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. 387 of 2008 Reserved on: 19.3.2026 Date of Decision: 12.05.2026 Brahma Ram ...Appellant Versus Kamla Devi & ors. ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ Yes.

For the Appellant : Mr G.R. Palsra, Advocate.

For the Respondents : Mr Lovneesh Kanwar, Senior Advocate, with Mr Tek Chand, Advocate.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The present appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 19.5.2008, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Mandi, H.P. (learned Appellate Court) vide which the judgment and decree dated 18.4.1997, passed by the learned Sub Judge First Class, Sarkaghat, District Mandi, HP, (learned trial Court) were upheld. (The parties shall hereinafter be referred

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned trial Court for convenience.

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rHise to the present appeal are that the plaintiff filed a civil suit seeking a declaration that the Will dated 22.4.1991 is invalid and not binding on the plaintiff. A consequential relief of a permanent