Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated26.06.2023 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kalpa at Reckong Peo, District Kinnaur, in case No.22/iv/2023, titled as Sh. Hir Chand Vs. Sh. Pramod Kumar and Another, whereby afore authority, while allowing the complaint filed by respondent No.1 under Section 147 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) directed petitioners herein to remove the obstruction caused by them on the path in dispute, petitionershave approached this Court praying therein to set aside aforesaid order.

2. It is pertinent to take note of the fact that a specific objection was raised at the behest of learned counsel representing the respondent No.1 that present petition is not maintainable as the order is revisable, and Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.01.2024, accepted the objection raised by the afore respondent that the present petition is not maintainable under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in view of the availability of alternative remedies. Thereafter, Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.07.2024 passed in Cr.MP No.1275 of 2024, allowed the application filed by the petitioner and ordered conversion of presentpetition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to Criminal Revision Petition.

3. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the pleadings adduced on record by the respecttive parties are that respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred to as ‘complainant’) filed a complaint before the Police alleging therein that petitioners have blocked the path (gair mumkin rasta) comprising of Khasra No.720, situate in village Basteri, Tehsil Sangla, District Kinnaur. Taking cognizance of afore complaint, Station House Officer, Police Station Sangla, District Kinnaur, conducted investigation and found that in case path alleged to be obstructed by petitioners is not opened, there may be breach of peace in the area and accordingly presented Kalandra under Section 147(4) of Cr.P.C. in the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kalpa at Reckong Peo, DistrictKinnaur, on 22.06.2023.

4. Immediately after receipt of afore Kalandra, Sub-Divisional Magistrate directed Tehsildar, Sangla, to give his report, who in his report dated 24.06.2023 though stated that path in dispute is in Khasra No.720, measuring 00-02-66 hectare, belonging to Mr. Basti Ram etc., but the same has been obstructed by Mr. Padam Singh son of Sh. Ajan Singh and Mr. Pramod Kumar son of Mr. Dharam Sukh, i.e. petitioners herein. Tehsildar, Sangla, further clarified in his report that as per local customary law, no person can stop other person’s path which leads to his fields. Besides above, Sub-Divisional Magistrate also ensured service of respondents i.e. petitioners herein and on 26.06.2023, recorded the statements of complainant as well as respondents, i.e. petitioners herein, and thereafter passed impugned order dated 26.06.2023 (Annexure P-1), thereby directing the petitioners herein to remove the obstruction on the path in dispute before 10:00 am otn 27.06.2023, failing which Tehsildar, Sangla, was ordered to remove the same with the help of SDO, PWD, Sangla, in Police presence. In the afore background, petitioners have approached this Court in the instant proceedings praying therein to setaside afore order.

5. Precisely, the grouse of the petitioners, as has been highlighted in the petition and further canvassed by Mr. Kul Bhushan Khajuria, learned counsel representing the petitioners, is that no opportunity of being heard was ever afforded to the petitioners by Sub-Divisional Magistrate before passing the impugned order. He further submitted that once it stood established on record that Khasra Nos.719 and 720 are owned and possessed by petitioners, there was no occasion, if any, for the authority concerned to eject them from their own land. Mr. Khajuria further submitted that question of title can only be adjudicated by the Civil Court and Sub-Divisional Magistrate