IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA RSA No. 36 of 2026.

Decided on : 8 ^th May, 2026.

Sh. Bhawani Parsad (since deceased) through his LR Smt. Sonam Palzom ...Appellant.

Versus f Smt. Chander Kala ....Respondent.

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellant: Mr. Lokesh Thakur, Advocate, vice C Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate.

For the Respondent: Mr. Panku Chaudhary and Mr. Rakesh h Kumar Chaudhary, Advocates.

Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral).

The present appeal arises out of the judgment and decree, as passed by learned Additional District Judge, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.. dated 06.01.2026, whereby the appeal filed by the present appellant was dismissed and the judgment and decree, as passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Kullu, District

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

Kullu, H.P., dated 01.08.2024, was affirmed, whereby the suit for declaration filed by the appellant/plaintiff was dismissed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that original plaintiff Bhawani Parsad had filed a suit for declaration on the ground that he is owner in possession of land comfprised in Khata No. 625, Khatauni No.842,