IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
JAGDISH CHAND AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.7043 of 2026 Decided on: 19.05.2026 _________________________________________________________________
Jagdish Chand and Anr ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors …Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reptorting?
________________________r_________________________________________
For the petitioners: Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General for respondent No.1.
Nemo for respondents No.2 to 8 Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner feels aggrieved against order dated
26.02.2024, passed by the Divisional Commissioner Mandi [exercising powers of Financial Commissioner, (Appeals) Himachal Pradesh], whereby revision petition preferred by the petitioners was dismissed.
2. Heard and considered the case file.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
3. From the case file, it appears that:- It was during the years 2003-04 that respondent No.2 moved an application under Section 123 of the Himachal Pradesh Land Revenue Act
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.