Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Sandeep Sharma, J
Durgesh Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts and the status of ongoing investigation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court reasons that bail should not be denied to accomplices when the main accused is already on bail. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. fundamental principles of personal liberty and the presumption of innocence in criminal jurisprudence. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. formal order making interim bail absolute subject to specific conditions. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Sequel to orders dated 06.05.2026, whereby this Court enlarged the bail-petitioners on interim bail in case FIR No.36/2025, dated 05.06.2025, under Sections 305 , 3(5), 61(2) of BNS, registered at Police Station Reckong Peo, District Kinnaur, HP, respondent/State has filed status report and HC Pankaj has come present with record. Record perused and returned.
2. Close scrutiny of status report/ record reveals that on 05.06.2025, Sh. Jagdish Soni, proprietor Jagdama Jewellers, Reckong Peo lodged a complaint at Police Station Reckong Peo, alleging therein that on 04.06.2025, two customers had come to his shop for purchasing jewellery. He alleged that while closing the shop in the evening, they found that golde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
