IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA RSA No. 166 of 2023, Decided on :13 ^th May, 2026.

Amita Sood ...Appellant.

Versus f Harmesh Kumar & Ors. ....Respondents.

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellant: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Himalvi and Ms.

h Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocates, for respondents No.1 to 4 and 8(iii).

Mr. Varun Rana, Advocate, for respondents No. 9(ii) to 9(iv), 9(vi), 10(iii), 11 to 13, 15(i) to 15 (iii).

Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral).

The present appeal arises out of the judgment and decree, as passed by learned Additional District Judge, Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P. dated 31.03.2023, whereby the appeal filed by the present appellant was dismissed and the

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

judgment and decree, as passed by learned Civil Judge Senior Division), Court No.1, Sundernagar, District Mandi, H. P., dated 30.06.2015, was affirmed whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff/appellant for declaration and possession was dismissed.

2. The brief facts of thef case are that the plaintiff/appellant