IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
G.S. Sandhawalia, CJ, Bipin Chander Negi, J
Mohit Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis of competitive examination and migration dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
Manish Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 7 to 11 and 13 to 15 in LPA No. 506 of 2024 and for respondent No.4 in LPA No. 34 of 2025 : Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.12 in LPA No. 506 of 2024 Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Since the aforesaid two appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 20.11.2024 and raise a common question, hence they are being taken up together. By virtue of the impugned judgment dated 20.11.2024, petitions preferred by the present appellants were dismissed by the learned Single Judge. For the adjudication of the appeals in the case at hand facts in CWPOA No. 5329 of 2019 wherefrom LPA No. 506 of 2024 arises are being considered herein below.
2. The present respondent No.5 had issued an advertisement bearing No. IV-2013 dated 1.1.2013 for selection of various posts to be filled up on the basis of Himachal Pradesh Administrative and Allied Services Competitive Examination, 2013. A perusal of the advertisement Annexure A-1 (page 16 of the writ paper book) reflects that the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Combined Competitive Examination consisted of thr
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research v. K.L. Narasimhan
Gaurav Pradhan v. State of Rajasthan
Jitendra Kumar Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Vikas Sankhala v. Vikas Kumar Agarwal
Government (NCT of Delhi) v. Praveen Kumar
Niravkumar Dilipbhai Makwana v. Gujarat Public Service Commission
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.