Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Romesh Verma, J
Dhani Ram – Appellant
Versus
Ram Krishan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of procedural history and factual background regarding the injunction dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. arguments and pleadings regarding the validity of revenue records and partition proceedings. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 3. evaluation of the tripartite test for interim injunctions. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 4. scope of high court's supervisory jurisdiction under article 227. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. final conclusion and dismissal of the petition on merit. (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
Whether approved for reporting?1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral)
The present petition has been preferred against the impugned judgment dated 22.09.2023, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Dehra, District Kangra, H.P. in CIS Registration No. 20 of 2023, titled Ram Krishan and others vs. Dhani Ram & others, whereby appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC filed by the present respondents was allowed and the Order dated 25.04.2023, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Court No. 2, Dehra, District Kangra, H.P. was set aside, whereby the applica
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
