IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL
RAJNI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP AND ORS – Respondent
CWP/3738/2022
##PAGE1##
2026:HHC:18538-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 3738 of 2022
Decided on: 20.05.2026
Rajni Devi … Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others o … Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 Yes
___________________________________________________________________
For the petitioner : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate.
For the respondents o : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General
with Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Additional
C AG.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has inter alia
prayed for the following reliefs:-
“(i) That the impugned Oder dated 28.5.2022 contained
in Annexure P-4 may kindly be quashed and set-aside.
ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to
extend the benefits of PTA Grant in Aid rules 2006 to the
petitioner without any discrimination, from the date of initial
appointment.
iii) That the instant writ petition may kindly be allowed
and the respondents may kindly be directed to extend the
benefit of Grant-in-Aid in favour of the present petitioner at
par with the similarly situated persons with all
::: Downloaded on - 31/05/2026 15:37:35 :::CIS
##PAGE2##2
2026:HHC:18538-DB
consequential benefits and take a decision in the light of the
judgment passed by Hon'ble Court in CWP No. 2549 of
2015, titled as Hem Raj Sharma vs. State of HP and CWP
No. 2638 of 2015, titled as Devi Saran vs. State of HP
(Annexure P-7 and P-8.”
3. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of this petition
are that the petitioner was engaged as a Drawing Master in
Government Senior oSecondary School, Pahara, Tehsil Palampur,
District Kangra, HP, by the Parents Teacher Association of said
school. She approached the Court earlier also with the prayer that
she bhe paid grant-in-aid in terms of the Grant-In-Aid Rules, 2006.
The earlier writ petition of the petitioner was ordered to be treated as
a representation and the Authority was directed to pass a decision
thereupon.
4. In terms of Annexure P-4, the Authority has rejected the
request of the petitioner by inter alia holding that the petitioner was
engaged by the SMC of the School when it was not authorised to
engage teachers in the school and as the engagement of the
petitioner was not in consonance with any policy of the State
Government, be it the grant-in-aid policy or some other policy, she
was not entitled for any relief.
5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
::: Downloaded on - 31/05/2026 15:37:35 :::CIS
##PAGE3##3
2026:HHC:18538-DB
petitioner since her engagement in the year 2010, is performing the
duties of a Drawing Master in a government school against the
sanctioned post. He further submitted that the petitioner is fully
qualified to hold the post in issue, yet, Grant-in-Aid is being denied
to the petitioner on the ground that she was not appointed under the
Grant-in-Aid Rules but was appointed by the SMC. With regard to
the impugned order, learned Counsel has submitted that though it
is the stand of the oAuthority that the SMC engaged the petitioner
when it was not authorized to engage teachers in the school, yet, fact
of the matter remains that the petitioner has been serving in the
schoohl concerned for the last 16 years, performing the duties of a
Drawing Master and no action has been taken by the Department
against her. In these circumstances, he submitted that neither the
impugned order is sustainable in the eyes of law nor the act of the
respondents of denying the petitioner the Grant-in-Aid is
sustainable. He also submitted that the petitioner was engaged by
Parent Teacher Association (PTA).
6. On the other hand, learned Advocate General by
referring to the reply filed by the State stated that in the present
case the petitioner was engaged by the School Management
Committee/Parent Teacher Association when there was no sanction
with the said Committee to appoint anyone. He further submitted
::: Downloaded on - 31/05/2026 15:37:35 :::CIS
##PAGE4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.