Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, J
Raksha Mankotia – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts regarding disputed seniority after condoned delay in joining. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. condonation of delay does not permit alteration of original promotion seniority. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. principle of parity and non-discrimination in service seniority matters. (Para 13 , 14) |
Whether approved for reporting?1Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge(Oral)
The petitioner, by way of present petition, has prayed for the following substantive reliefs:-
“(i) That a Writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 9.7.2009 whereby while condoning the period of joining, a condition has been imposed to grant the seniority as Head Mistress from the date of joining in her present place of posting (Annexure P-3), order dated 10.6.2009 passed by respondent no. 3 (Annexure P-6), order-dated 31.8.2010 passed by respondent no.3 (Annexure P-6), order-dated 31.8.2010 passed by respondent no.3 (Annexure P-7), as well as the order dated January 2011, (received by the petitioner on 18.2.2012 (Annexure P-10) and also to quash the promotions of the respondent nos. 4 to 16 who being
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
