Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Romesh Verma, J
Anita Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Land Acquisition Officer, NHAI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the petition for time extension regarding arbitration proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. judicial duty to enforce statutory timelines on arbitral authorities. (Para 5) |
| 3. exercise of judicial discretion to grant a final extension for award delivery. (Para 6) |
Romesh Verma, Judge
(Oral)
Notice.
Mr. Shivanshu, learned vice counsel and Mr. B.S. Negi, learned Additional Advocate General, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective respondents.
The present petition under Section 29-A (4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the petitioner seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitration proceedings in Arbitration Case No.1254 of 2017, titled
as Anita Kumari vs. Collector Land Acquisition, National Highways Authority of India, pending before the National Highways Authority of India-cum-Divisional Commissioner, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P., exercising the powers of Arbitrator under Section 3(G) of the National Highways Act, 1956.
2. The arbitral dispute has arisen out of the land acquired in District Kullu, H.P. for the purpose of construction of the National Highway, land for which has been acquired un
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
