Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, J
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges denial of 'teacher' status despite nature of duties performed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. statutory definitions of 'teacher' include those imparting instruction and guidance. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. coaches providing training and guidance fall within the functional definition of teaching staff. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. formal court order directive to recognize status and release pay arrears. (Para 19 , 20) |
The petitioner by way of present petition has prayed for the following substantive reliefs:-
“(a) That the impugned letter dated 20.08.2015 Annexure A-8 may kindly be set aside and quashed and the respondent department may be directed to declare the applicant as teacher in view of the Apex Court judgment in case titled P.S. Ramamohanan Rao Versus A.P. Agriculture University (AIR 1997 Supreme Court 3433).
(b) That the respondent may be directed to release the benefit of revision of UGC pay scale since 01.01.2006 alongwith entire arrears and interest accrued thereupon till its payment.”
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the key facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed vide order dated 29.09.2000 (Annexure A
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
