IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROMESH VERMA
DEVMANI – Appellant
Versus
KHEM RAJ AND ORS – Respondent
Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral).
1. The present petition arises out of the order as passed by the learned District Judge, Mandi, on 12.06.2025 in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 6 of 2025, whereby the appeal preferred by the present petitioner/plaintiff was dismissed and the order as passed by the learned Civil Judge, Chachiot at Gohar, District Mandi, H.P. dated 31.01.2025 was affirmed, whereby the application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff for grant of injunction under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC was dismissed. Whether approved for reporting?1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff/petitioner filed a suit in the Court of learned Civil Judge, Chachiot at Gohar for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction. It was averred in the plaint that the consolidation proceedings started in Muhal Chail/51, Tehsil Chachiot, District Mandi, H.P. in the year 1989. Defendants No.1 to 3 in connivance with the consolidation authorities filed separate applications for partition of land on 06.03.1992. The Consolidation Officer in league with defendants No.1 to 3, without the consent and without granting any
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.