SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 406

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
Shri Anikesh Banerjee, J, Shri Girish Agrawal, ACJ
HDFC Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Addl. CIT/ACIT/DCIT – Respondent


ORDER

PER BENCH:

All these captioned 42 appeals filed by both, assessee and revenue are against the orders of Ld. CIT(A) passed against the assessment/penalty order by Addl.CIT/ACIT/DCIT, Mumbai.Consolidated details of these appeals are tabulated below:

2. Except for appeals mentioned at Sr. Nos. 24 and 39 to 42 in the above table, all the appeals arise out of assessment orders passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) for assessment years 2002- 03 up to 2020-21. Since, similar issues are arising in several years, before dealing with each of the issues, reference is made in a tabular form to the ground numbers where the said issue is arising in all the concerned assessment years.

2.1. There are delays in filing seven appeals, details of which are tabulated below. Petition for condonation of delay is placed on record. Upon perusal of the same and hearing both sides, we deem it fit to condone the delay on the ground that there was sufficient cause for the said delay. Accordingly, we take up the appeals for adjudication.

Sr. No.ITA No.Assessment YearAppeal byNo. of Days Delay
12980/Mum/20242014-15Revenue18
22979/Mum/20242015-16Revenue18
32049/Mum/20232016-17Revenue1
42046/Mum/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top