INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (BANGALORE BENCH)
SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACJ, SHRI KESHAV DUBEY, J
MKH Infrastructure – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Department – Respondent
ORDER
PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These appeals are emanated from different orders of CIT(A) for the assessment years 2017-18 & 2018-19 in case of above three assessees.
ITA Nos.414 & 415/Bang/2024 (AY 2017-18 & 2018-19)
Emirates Hindustan Builders and Developers:
2. First, we will take ITA Nos.414 & 415/Bang/2024, wherein certain issues are common except figures, hence these are clubbed together, heard together and disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. In this appeal the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal in ITA No.414/Bang/2024:
1. “The ld. CIT(A) erred in passing the order in the manner he did.
2. The ld. CIT(A) further erred in confirming the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without appreciating the submission of the appellant.
3. The ld. CIT(A) further erred in confirming the order of assessing officer by merely relying on sworn statement of the partner without any incriminating material having being found.
4. The ld. CIT(A) further erred in not appreciating that return in response to notice u/s 148 was filed only on 4.1.2019 and hence the assessment was time barred.
5. The ld. CIT(A) further erred in assessing the income u/s




Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.