INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AHMEDABAD BENCH)
Siddhartha Nautiyal, Annapurna Gupta, JJ
SHRI NAGIN A VAGHELA VADODARA – Appellant
Versus
THE ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3 VADODARA – Respondent
ORDER
PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL - JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These appeals are filed by the Department and Assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12 (in short “CIT(A)”), Ahmedabad vide separate orders dated 26.07.2019, 05.12.2019, 27.08.2019 and 25.03.2021 passed for A.Ys. 2011-12, 2012-13, 2014-15 and 2017-18.
We shall first start the Department’s appeal for A.Y. 2011-12 in IT(SS)A No. 449/Ahd/2019:
2. The Department has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CIT(A) has erred in holding that any addition during the assessment u/s.l53A has to be confined to the incriminating material found during the course of search u/s. 132(1) of the Act, even though, there is no such stipulation in sec. 153 A of the Act.
2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating that sec. 153A requires a notice to be issued requiring the assessee to furnish his return of income in respect of each assessment year falling within six assessment years and to assess or re-assess the total income of those six assessment years, and that the scheme of assessment or re-a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.