The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of providing adequate opportunity for hearing to the assessee, reaffirming principles of natural justice in tax proceedings.

ORDER

PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE ,JM:

The assesse has filed the appeal against the order of the NFAC/CIT(A) Delhi passed u/sec147 r.w.s144 and u/sec 250 of the Act. The assessee has raised the grounds of appeal challenging the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) sustaining the additions made by the Assessing Officer.

2. The brief facts of the case are that, the assesse has filed the return of income for the A.Y.2015-16 disclosing a total income of Rs.2,82,400/- on 22.07.2015.The Assessing Officer (AO) based on the information found that the assessee has not disclosed the income from house property, interest income from cooperative bank and fixed deposits with the bank. The assessing officer has reason to believe that the income has escaped the assessment and has issued notice u/sec148 of the Act and also the notice u/sec142(1) of the Act was issued to furnish the details and sources of investments and there was no compliance. Whereas the A.O found that the assesse has made (i) fixed deposit of Rs.50,00,000/-in the bank and received interest income of Rs.8.35.837/- and income from house property as per ITS details of Rs.2,50,000/- were not offered for tax and explanations were called to substantiate the sources of deposit and were remain unexplained. Since, no explanations/details were filed, the AO considering the information available on record has invoked the provisions of Sec.144 of the Act and made additions and assessed the total income of Rs.63,68,237/- and passed the order u/sec147r.w.s 144 of the Act dated 15.09.2021.

3. Aggrieved by the order, the assesse has filed an appeal before the CIT(A), whereas the CIT(A) has considered the grounds of appeal, statement of facts and findings of the AO and has issued notices of hearing and since there was no compliance by the assessee to notices. Therefore the CIT(A) considering the information on record has confirmed the action of the A.O and dismissed the appeal. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A), the assesse has filed an appeal before the Hon'ble Tribunal.

4. We heard the Ld.DR submissions and perused the material on record and none appeared on behalf of the assesse. Prima-facie the CIT(A) has passed the order considering the fact that there is no compliance in spite of providing adequate opportunity of hearing and the notices were issued. Therefore, the CIT(A) was of the opinion that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal and dismissed the appeal ex-parte confirming the action of the assessing officer. The Ld. CIT(A) has issued the notices of hearing referred at Page 4 Para 6 of the CIT(A) order but there was no response and thus the Ld.CIT(A) came to a conclusion that the assessee is not interested and decided the appeal based on the information available on record. Whereas the assessee has raised grounds of appeal challenging the additions by the A.O and there could be various reasons for non appearance which cannot be overruled. Therefore, considering the principles of natural justice, we shall provide with one more opportunity of hearing to the assessee to substantiate the case with evidences and information. Accordingly, set aside the order of the CIT(A) and remit the entire disputed issues to the file of the CIT(A) to adjudicate afresh on merits and the assessee should be provided adequate opportunity of hearing and shall cooperate in submitting the information for early disposal of appeal. And, we allow the grounds of appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes.

5. In the result, the appeal filed by assesse is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 09.04.2025.