SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 1565

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (RANCHI BENCH)
SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, J
LAXMI HARD COKE MFG CO. DHANBAD – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD 1(1) DHANBAD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeals preferred by the assessee (Para 1)
2. assessment order should have been passed (Para 2)
3. search had taken place (Para 3)
4. entire basis for reopening (Para 4)
5. appropriate procedure is section 153c (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER

PER: PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1. Both these appeals preferred by the assessee emanate from the separate orders of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC)/learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short, the ld. CIT(A)] both dated 24/03/2023 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17 and 2018-19 respectively as per the grounds of appeal on record. Facts and circumstances of both these appeals are common. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in both these appeals are identical, therefore, with the consent of parties, both these appeals were clubbed and heard together and are being decided by this common order.

2. In these appeals, the assessee has preferred both the grounds on merit as well as legal ground. One of the legal ground that has been assailed in these appeals are that a search had taken place in a third party premises and certain incriminating materials were found there which pertains to the assessee which fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top