INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AHMEDABAD BENCH)
Smt. Annapurna Gupta, ACJ, Ms. Suchitra Kamble, J
SUNNY TARUNKUMAR DOSHI JETPUR – Appellant
Versus
THE ITO WARD-1(1)(1) AHMEDABAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. grounds of appeal (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. appeal dismissed (Para 8) |
ORDER
PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal is filed by the Assessee against order dated 28.10.2021, passed by the CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for the Assessment Year 2014-15.
2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :-
“1. Learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on the facts of the case in confirming the action of learned AO in assuming the jurisdiction u/s.147 of the Act.
2. Learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts of the case in confirming the action of learned AO in making an addition of Rs.69,49,250/- u/s.56(2)(vii)(b) of the Act.
3. Learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on the facts of the case in confirming the action of AO in charging interest u/s.234A/B/C/D.
4. The Learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on the facts of the case in confirming the action of AO in initiating penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act which is wholly unsustainable in law and on facts of the case.”
2.1 The assessee has also raised the following additional ground:
“The appellant craves leave to raise this additional ground of appeal before Your Honors. The appellant, throu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.