SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 1311

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (INDORE BENCH)
Shri Vijay Pal Rao, J, Shri B.M. Biyani, ACJ
Revenue – Appellant
Versus
Assessee – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ld. DR
For the Respondents: Ld. AR

आदेश/ORDER

Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:

These three appeals are filed by revenue against three separate appeal- orders dated 14.10.2014, 27.01.2015 and 22.04.2015 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-I, Bhopal [“CIT(A)”] which in turn arises out of respective assessment-orders dated 29.12.2011, 18.03.2013 and 31.03.2014passed by learned ACIT-1(2) / ITO-1(1), Bhopal[“AO”] u/ s 143(3)of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 respectively.

2. Learned Representatives of both sides have made vehement oral arguments as well as filed their written-synopsis. We have considered their submissions, the orders passed by lower-authorities and the documents held in case record to which our attention has been drawn.

3. The background facts leading to these appeals are such that the assessee is a firm engaged in real estate business. The assessee filed returns of AY 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 after claiming deduction u/ s 80-IB(10) relating to income from developing and building housing projects. The returns were selected for scrutiny-assessment and the AO issued notices u/ s 143(2)/ 142(1) to assessee. Finally, the AO completed as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top