SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 746

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH)
Shri Shamim Yahya, ACJ, Shri Sudhir Pareek, J
AMBIKA ALLOYS NEW DELHI – Appellant
Versus
PCIT CENTRAL GURGAON – Respondent
ITA 1918/DEL/2024



Advocates:
Sh. Kapil Goel, Adv. & Sh. Sandeep Goel, Adv. for Assessee; Ms. Nidhi Singh, CIT(DR) & Sh. Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR for Revenue

A mechanical approval under Section 153D without application of mind renders the assessment order null and void, and such an order cannot be revised under Section 263.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 153C and 263 - Validity of revision order - The revision order passed under Section 263 was challenged as null and void ab initio due to lack of valid incriminating material and mechanical approval under Section 153D - The court found the assessment order invalid and quashed the revision order. (Paras 2, 10, 23)

(B) Jurisdiction - The court held that a non-est order cannot be subject to revision under Section 263, reaffirming that valid approval is a prerequisite for assessment. (Paras 10, 24)

Facts of the case:
The appeals were filed against the revision orders passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, challenging the validity of the underlying assessment orders due to lack of jurisdiction and proper approval. (Paras 2, 3)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the approval under Section 153D was mechanical and lacked application of mind, rendering the assessment orders null and void. (Paras 23, 24)

Issues: The main issues included the validity of the revision order under Section 263 and the legality of the underlying assessment order under Section 153D. (Paras 2, 10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that a mechanical approval without due application of mind is invalid, and a non-est order cannot be revised under Section 263. (Paras 23, 24)

Result: Appeals allowed.

Table of Content
1. revision order is invalid (Para 2 , 3)
2. disputed issues covered (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
3. mechanical approval is invalid (Para 23 , 24)
4. all appeals filed by the assessee (Para 25)

ORDER

PER SUDHIR PAREEK, JM

These appeals are preferred by the different Assessee against the different order dated 11.03.2024, 13.03.2024, 14.03.2024, 15.03.2024, passed by the Learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon (hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld. PCIT’)/, for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2013-14 and 2014-15.

2. Issues raised in all these appeals are identical hence they are taken up together and disposed by this common order for the sake of convenience. We reproduced the following grounds of appeal in ITA No.- 1918/D/2024, by the assessee:

“1. Revision order U/s 263 is invalid because Asst. Order itself in invalid: Tht impugned revision order passd u/s 263 of 1961 Act by PCIT central Gurgaon is non est and nullity because it is founded on underlying assessment order passed u/s 153C which itself is nullity and totally invalid and is passed without authority of law.

1.1 That impugned revision order u/s 263 is nullity and void ab initio because for present ‘unabated ‘year there is total lack of valid / requisite incriminating material for making valid assessment u/s 153C of 1961 Act so impugned asst. Is also invalid.

1.2 That impugned revision order u/s 263 is nullity and void ab initio because impugned assessment without doubting audited / regular books u/s 145(3) and without appreciating factum of sales / trading receipts has arbitrarily disallowed entire purchases as alleged ‘bogus’ purchases which is totally impermissible;

1.3 That impugned revision order u/s 63 is nullify and void ab initio because underlying asst. order is founded on invalid / mechanical approval u/s 153D of 1961 Act.

1.4 That impugned revision order u/s 263 is nullity and void ab initito because underlying assessment is made totally contrary to provisions of 1961 Act and applicable binding CBDT instruction / guidelines.

2. ABRITRARINESS AND TOTAL NON APPLICATION OF MIND ON PART OF PCIT(C): That impugned revision order u/s 263 is nullity and void ab initio because same is passed in totally arbitrary manner without application of mind as evident from cursory look to the same.

3. COMPLETE AND PATENT LACK OF JURISDICTION U/S 263: That impugned revision order u/s 263 is nullity and void ab initito because it is passed in violation of jurisdiction pre-requisite conditions stipulated under the 1961 Act as the only basis to invoke revisionary jurisdiction is purported (vague / alternate) reference to provision of Sec. 68 and / sec. 69C qua accounted / recorded purchases which is held to be totally unlawful and without any legal rationale in various binding precedents which are not given any heed by PCIT(C) Gurgaon.

4. ASST. ORDER WITH APPROVAL U/S 153D: CAN NOT BE REVISED U/S “That impugned revision order u/s 263 is nullity and void ab initio as underlying assessment order admittedly passed with statutory approval u/s 153D cannot be revised u/s 263 of 1961 Act, as held in series of juridical precedents.

5. PENDING FIRST APPEAL SO NO REVISION U/S 263 PERMISSIBLE:

That impugned revision order u/s 263 is nullity and void ab initio as there is valid appeal pending before first appeal authority which denudes power of revision u/s 263 of 1961 Act.

6. LACK OF VALID SCN U/S 263 :That impugned revision order u/s 263 is nullity and void ab initio as there is violation of principle of natural justice and lack of valid scn u/s 263 of 1961 Act.”

3. We take ITA No.- 1918/Del/2024 as a lead case. In this case, a search and seizure operation u/s 132 and survey operation u/s 133(A) were conducted on 03.05.2018 in M/s Jai Bharat Group of cases, Samalkha, Panipat. The assessee’s case was also covered u/s 133(A) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

4. At the time of hearing,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top