INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AHMEDABAD BENCH)
SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACJ, SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, J
BABUBHAI RAMANBHAI PATEL AHMEDABAD – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT PRESENT JURISDICTION THE ITO WARD-1(3)(1) AHMEDABAD – Respondent
आदेश/ORDER
PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
The above appeal has been filed by the assessee against order passed by the Ld.Commissioner of Income-Tax(Appeals),National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “ld.CIT(A) dated 17.10.2023 under section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short) pertaining to Assessment Years 2020- 2021.
2. Grounds raised by the assessee in the appeal read as under:
“1. In law and in facts and circumstances of the Appellant's case, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) has grossly erred in points of law and facts.
2. In law and in the facts and circumstances of the Appellant's case, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has grossly erred in confirming addition of income from other sources of Rs.61,20,000 u/s 56(2)(x)(b) of IT Act.
3. In law and in the facts and circumstances of the Appellant's case, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has grossly erred in confirming the demand of Rs 22,59,772.
4. In law and in the facts and circumstances of the Appellant's case, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has grossly erred in not deciding ground regarding charging of the int
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.