Back
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (BANGALORE BENCH)
Mrs. Beena Pillai, J, Shri Ramit Kochar, ACJ
MANOHARS CATERING BENGALURU – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-7(2)(3) BANGALORE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identification of facts regarding the assessment. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural errors and notices. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on the appeals and procedural compliance. (Para 4 , 7) |
| 4. final decision to allow appeal for statistical purposes. (Para 8) |
ORDER
PER SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal, in ITA No. 1393/Bang/2024 being filed by the assessee has arisen from the appellate order dated 30.01.2018 passed by Ld. CIT(A) under section 250 of the Act wherein ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee ex- parte in the absence of the assessee for non-prosecution , the appellate proceedings before ld. CIT(A) had arisen from the assessment order dated 24.12.2010 passed by the ld. Assessing Officer under section 143(3) of the Act.
2. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in Memo of appeal filed with Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Benches, Bangalore, reads as under:
“ 1. The order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Bangalore is opposed to law and facts of the case.
2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) has erred in dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant on the only ground that no
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
