INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AHMEDABAD BENCH)
Smt. Annapurna Gupta, ACJ, Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar, J
Revenue – Appellant
Versus
Shri Biren Shah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of transaction details and grounds for cancellation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. argument regarding validity of transaction and consideration of tenancy law. (Para 5) |
आदेश/ORDER
PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
This appeal is filed by the Revenue as against the appellate order dated 23.09.2020 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Ahmedabad arising out of the reassessment order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2012-13.
2. The registry has noted that there is a delay of 34 days in filing the above appeal. This appeal is filed before the Tribunal on 15.01.2021, this period falls under COVID-19 Pandemic situation. Thus following Hon’ble Supreme Court judgment dated 23.3.2020 in suo moto Writ Petition (Civil) No.3 of 2020, which has extended time limit for filing appeals w.e.f. 15.3.2020. Thus, there is no delay in filing the above appeal by the Department and we take up the appeal for adjudication on merits.
3. The brief facts of the case is that assessee alo ng with other two co-owners purchased agricultural land at RS No.136 (Old RS No. 199
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.