SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 507

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (LUCKNOW BENCH)
SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, J
SARALA SINGH LUCKNOW – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER- 4(3) LUCKNOW – Respondent


Table of Content
1. assessee raised grounds of appeal (Para 4)
2. delay in filing appeal (Para 9)
3. restoration of appeal for fair hearing (Para 10)
4. appeal allowed for statistical purposes (Para 11)

ORDER

This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against order dated 01.01.2024, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) for Assessment Year 2021-22.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed her return of income for the year under consideration on 03.03.2022, declaring a total income of Rs.20,430/-. The case of the assessee was selected for complete scrutiny for the reason that large cash was deposited in bank account and the assessee had also purchased/sold one or more property(ies) during the year under consideration. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued statutory notices to the assessee. The assessee participated in the assessment proceedings and furnished reply along with bank statements, details of properties sold and purchased, copies of purchase and sale deeds and details of payments. As per the Bank Account statement, the assessee had made a total cash deposits of Rs.33,00,000/- in her Saving Bank Account No.77370100014039 maintained with Bank

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top