Back
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DEHRADUN BENCH)
YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JM, MANISH AGARWAL, AM
Sh. Nitin Singhal Matta Garg & Co. Chartered Accountants – Appellant
Versus
ITO U.S. Nagar Ward-2(2)(4) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's justification for delay due to pandemic. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments focusing on the liberal approach to condoning delays. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. overview of assessment leading to the appeal. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's observations on merits and dismissal. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. final ruling of dismissal. (Para 11) |
BEFORE SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 08/DDN/2024 (A.Y 2015-16)
ORDER PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM:
Sh. Nitin Singhal Matta Garg & Co. Chartered Accountants, 15, Astley Hall, Dehradun, Uttarakhand PAN: AQWPS4877P
Vs. ITO
U.S. Nagar Ward-2(2)(4), Bajpur, UdhamSingh Nagar, Uttarakhand, 262401
Appellant
Respondent
Assessee by None
Revenue by Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr. DR
Date of Hearing 04/08/2025
Date of Pronouncement 08/08/2025
The present appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (‘NFAC ’ for short] dated 12/04/2023 for the Assessment Year
2015-16.
2. None appeared for the Assessee. Considering the issue involved in the present Appeal, we deem it fit to decide
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
